nuo aattelin käskeä laittamaan, katsoo mitä saadaan aikaiseksi. Ikuinen ongelmahan on että eivät osaa suuntauksessa laittaa "oikeita" arvoja madallettuun mersuun kun ei niitä koneelta saa.I dug out the alignment specifications that were printed out when my 1995 E320 was aligned after I added the Eibach springs. The Porsche race-tuner mechanic found specifications for Mercedes Benz, 92-95, 124.034, Sport Suspension. I asked for minimum toe in hopes that the tires would not get worn-out on the the outside edge of the front tires and I thought the rear camber should be in line with the maximum range for the front specification. I figured the rear camber wasn’t specified because it isn’t adjustable from the factory, but I have the K-MAC rear bushings so I wanted it adjusted. The following number are all measured in units of degrees.
Front :
Camber: Min -1.33, Nominal -1.00, Max -0.83, Actual Left -1.2, Actual Right -1.1
Caster: Min 9.92, Nominal 10.42, Max 10.92, Actual Left 10.5, Actual Right10.1
Toe: Min 0.08, Nominal 0.17, Max 0.25, Actual left 0.09, Actual Right 0.08
Cross Camber: Min -0.33, Nominal 0.00, Max 0.33, Actual -0.00
Cross caster: Min -0.50, Nominal 0.00, Max 0.50, Actual 0.8
Total Toe 0.17 0.33 0.50 0.18
Rear :
Camber: Actual Left -1.2, Actual Right -1.3
Toe: Min 0.13, Nominal 0.21, Max 0.29, Actual Left 0.14, Actual Right 0.15
Total Toe: Min 0.25, Nominal 0.42, Max 0.59, Actual 0.29
My car has a sporty look with the visible negative camber, it handles very well, it tracks straight, and so far my tires do not seem to be worn on the the outside edge like they were when the car was stock.
edit: tietääkö joku mikä uudistus tulee -88 jälkeen etu "napoihin" tai vastaavaan , vanhemmissa on tuota ongelmaa hieman, että ratista kun kääntää ääriasentoon niin ohjaus tavallaan "imaisee"
